Select language, opens an overlay

Comments (13)

Community comments are the opinions of contributing users. These comments do not represent the opinions of Jefferson County Public Library.
What did you think about this title?
1 to 13 of 13 items
Apr 22, 2023BPDaegan rated this title 2.5 out of 5 stars
Something about the acting by Scott Eastwood at times leaves me wanting for more in this. Some of the scenery in this and how it's shot is SPECTACULAR and perhaps reason enough to watch the film. There's a thought provoking surprise in…
Jun 06, 2017
I haven't bothered to comment in here on a movie before, but instead of beating myself up over having watched the whole thing, maybe someone can be saved by reading this. Not much to add to the other comments except that continuity seemed…
Nov 14, 2016JackPurcell rated this title 2.5 out of 5 stars
Watching young Eastwood is a strange experience. If his dad had been bereft of talent and put into the movies anyway into really lousy parts this would have been Clint.
Oct 26, 2016
It is a disturbing and twisted movie (although with beautiful landscapes & music). Not recommended -- skip this one.
Sep 14, 2016Ba_kuPlanet rated this title 2 out of 5 stars
Dirty Harry + Van Gogh + Sybil = Diablo. Scott Eastwood is a physical reincarnation of his father Clint Eastwood. To bad his career is starting off playing characters doing wrong (not the underdog bad guy doing right like Dirty Harry or…
Jul 14, 2016jimg2000 rated this title 2 out of 5 stars
Read the across the board negative reviews but sold by the "action packed" "killer" "Western" story line. Well, first 20 minutes was not good. The next 20 minutes was more of the same. There was an unusual "Post Traumatic Stress syndrome"…
Jun 17, 2016
Yep it was pretty bad, not worth 90 minutes of my time and a complete waste of some talented actors skills
Jun 04, 2016LauraSteinert rated this title 2 out of 5 stars
1 star because it is a western--and who doesn't love a western. 1 star because there was a real effort to cast non-white actors in non-white roles. I have so many questions. Was the script that bad at the beginning or did Eastwood's…
maynelovesu
May 16, 2016
Horrible! ,No one knows how to aim and shoot but him..Very weak cowboy movie...
May 16, 2016mmoors rated this title 2 out of 5 stars
Though this is by no means a great movie, I didn't think it was as bad as most of the critics here. Granted, Scott Eastwood is not a compelling actor, but "Rowdy Yates" was pretty shallow in his youth as well. As another reviewer…
Louuuuu
Apr 22, 2016Louuuuu rated this title 0.5 out of 5 stars
Yikes. Another stinkeroo from Scott Eastwood. Can't this guy get work in "normal" movies?
Apr 14, 2016tuffduff rated this title 2 out of 5 stars
Misguided "psychological western" is redeemed only by beautiful outdoor cinematography . If Scott Eastwood wants to follow in his daddy's footsteps he would do well to follow a more conventional format.
Apr 13, 2016tj_is_cool rated this title 1.5 out of 5 stars
Not good. The reason is disappointing plot.